Why Shorting Is Harder Than Longing – Even in a Bear Market

I strongly recommend reading this article all the way to the end; your money is precious, and knowledge is what protects it.

1. “In a bear market, shorting should be easy”… right?

Most new traders think like this:

“In a bull market you go long, in a bear market you go short.
So if the market is in a clear downtrend, shorting must be the easiest way to make money.”

On paper that sounds logical.
In reality, traders who’ve survived a few cycles will tell you the opposite:

Shorts are structurally more dangerous, and leveraged futures shorts are where accounts go to die.

And here’s the paradox I want to focus on in this post:

Even in a one-way, brutal downtrend, shorting often feels harder than longing.

You can be right about the direction, right about the macro picture, and still get wiped out by one violent squeeze candle in a leveraged short.

In this article I’ll walk through:

Why shorts are structurally disadvantaged compared to longs
Why leveraged futures shorts are especially dangerous
Why even in a strong downtrend, shorting can be harder than it looks
How to use shorts in a more professional, risk-controlled way

Bitcoin 2020 crash daily chart with multiple sharp relief rallies during a larger downtrend

2. Structural reasons shorts are weaker than longs

2.1 Asymmetric payoff: limited gain, theoretically unlimited loss

A long position has a simple, intuitive profile:

Max loss ≈ 100% (if the asset goes to zero)
Potential gain is theoretically unlimited

A short is the mirror image:

Max gain is 100% (if the asset goes to zero from your entry)
Loss is unlimited in theory, because price can keep going up

In practice, you’re not holding to infinity. But the risk of a sudden, violent move against you is much more dangerous on the short side because:

Short squeezes tend to be vertical and brutal
Your liquidation point on leverage is usually much closer than you think

So from the start, shorts are playing with a worse payoff structure than longs.

2.2 Markets are biased upward over time

In traditional equities, this is obvious:

Earnings, inflation, buybacks, and economic growth slowly push indices higher.

Crypto is different – it’s more brutal and cyclical – but the pattern is still there:

Every cycle brings in new liquidity, new narratives, and bigger capital
Large coins like BTC and ETH have historically made higher cycle lows and higher cycle highs

That means “just holding and surviving” is a viable strategy on the long side if you size correctly and avoid leverage.

On the short side, “just holding and surviving” is suicide.
You are betting against:

Long-term monetary debasement
Structural inflows (ETFs, funds, institutions, retail)
The perpetual search for the “next big thing”

Time tends to help longs and hurt shorts.

2.3 Short squeezes and position crowding

When too many traders pile into shorts, the market becomes fragile on the upside. All it takes is:

A slightly better-than-expected news item
A single large market buy
A coordinated stop hunt

…to trigger a short squeeze.

In a squeeze:

Price starts rising
Short stops and liquidations trigger forced market buys
Those buys push price even higher
More shorts liquidate → more forced buying → vertical move

This reflexive loop is why short squeezes are often sharper and faster than long liquidations.

Bitcoin daily chart showing a short squeeze candle with a large green body and long upper wick inside a broader downtrend

2.4 Carry cost: borrow fees & funding rates

To be short, you usually pay some kind of cost:

In stocks: borrow fees and hard-to-borrow premiums on popular shorts
In crypto perps: funding rates can work against you

When perps trade below spot in a panic, funding can flip negative.
In many contracts, shorts pay longs when funding is negative.

So imagine:

You’re short in a downtrend (direction correct)
Price is drifting down, but slowly
Funding stays negative for days or weeks

You’re winning on price, but bleeding funding the entire time.
Again, this is structurally worse than just holding a spot long with no extra cost.

3. Why leveraged futures shorts are uniquely dangerous

Spot shorts are already risky.
Leveraged futures shorts are exponentially worse, especially in crypto.

3.1 Leverage compresses your “error margin”

If you’re 1× short and price moves +10% against you, you lose 10%. Painful, but survivable.

If you’re 10× short and price spikes +10%, you’re not just losing 100% on that position – you probably get force-liquidated long before +10%.

Crypto markets are insanely volatile
Wicks of +5–15% within a day are not rare, especially on altcoins
With high leverage, those moves are enough to nuke you even if the larger trend remains bearish

So you can be:

Correct on the daily trend
Correct on the macro picture
Still liquidated by a random candle on the way down

Bitcoin 2020 crash daily chart with multiple sharp relief rallies during a larger downtrend

3.2 Liquidation cascades and exchange mechanics

In leveraged futures, your position is not just between you and “the market.”
The exchange’s risk engine is always watching:

Once your margin falls below a threshold, they start closing your position
Your liquidation is executed as a market order, often into thin order books
That slippage can trigger the next person’s liquidation
In extreme cases, you get cascading liquidations

On the short side, a rapid move up can trigger cascades of short liquidations, creating the classic vertical green candle that destroys anyone who was “just a bit too late” to enter.

You are not only fighting direction; you’re fighting leverage structure + order book + exchange liquidation algorithm.

3.3 24/7 markets: the squeeze can hit while you sleep

In equities, at least the market closes.
In crypto:

The market never sleeps
Funding never stops
Liquidations can happen at 3 a.m. your time

A high-leverage short on BTC or an alt can get blown out by:

A random weekend pump
A low-liquidity short squeeze during Asia or U.S. session
A single tweet or unexpected news headline

You wake up, the long-term chart still looks bearish.
But your futures account is already gone.

4. The paradox: why shorts feel harder even in a one-way downtrend

Here’s the core of my view:

Even in a brutal, one-way bear market, shorting with leverage is often harder than longing.

4.1 The path is chaotic, even if the direction is clear

Downtrends rarely look like perfect straight lines.
More often, they look like this:

-30%, then +15% squeeze
-20%, then +10% bounce
Slow grind down, then sudden violent spike up, then deeper crash

So you might be right about “price is going much lower,” but:

You short at a breakdown
Price bounces sharply
Your stop or liquidation level gets hit
After you’re out, price resumes the downtrend you predicted

Being right on direction does not guarantee being right on timing + path, and timing + path is what kills futures accounts.

High-beta altcoin 2022 bear market daily chart with several +30–50% bear market rallies inside a larger downtrend

4.2 Emotional trap: taking profits too early, adding shorts too late

In a strong downtrend, short sellers often:

Enter a good short
Panic and take profit quickly on a small move down
Watch price drop much lower without them
Chase a late short at the bottom of a leg
Get squeezed on the natural bounce

Your P&L ends up terrible despite the trend being your friend.
The emotional stress of being short – especially with leverage – makes it hard to:

Sit through normal volatility
Hold winning positions
Avoid revenge-shorting every bounce

Longs in a bull market have the opposite advantage:
Even if they take profits too early, they can often re-enter on dips with less existential stress.

4.3 Overcrowded shorts and funding pain in downtrends

In obvious downtrends, “short is the easy trade” becomes a consensus idea.
When too many people believe that:

Short interest rises
Perps can trade at a discount
Funding flips negative and shorts start paying longs

Now you have a really unpleasant combo:

Direction: right (price is drifting down)
P&L: weak, because every day you’re paying funding to hold the short
Mindset: you feel forced to use more leverage or more size to make it “worth it”
Result: one short squeeze wipes out weeks of slow gains

The structure of the product is silently working against you.

5. Special case: altcoin futures shorts

All of the above gets worse on altcoins:

Order books are thinner
Wicks are nastier
Liquidations move price more
News is more random and unpriced

An altcoin in a clear macro downtrend can still:

Pump +30–50% in a single day on a rumor or a single whale
Trigger massive short liquidations on the way up
Then dump even harder after you’re already liquidated

For professional traders with strict risk systems, altcoin shorts can be profitable.
For most retail traders using high leverage, they’re just a faster way to lose the account.

Thin-liquidity altcoin daily chart with repeated long wicks both up and down, showing how easily liquidations move price

6. So how should you use shorts?

I’m not saying “never short.”
I’m saying: treat shorts as a precision tool, not a default setting.

6.1 Primary role: hedging, not gambling

The most professional way to think about shorts:

Hedge, not lottery ticket

Examples:

You hold a large spot BTC or ETH position; you open a moderate short on perps to reduce downside during uncertain macro events
You have a portfolio of altcoins; you short a broader index or major coin to reduce beta risk

Here, the purpose is not “get rich from the short.”
It’s “protect what I already own.”

When you use shorts like this:

Smaller leverage is enough
You’re less emotionally attached to the trade
You’re not trying to time every candle; you’re managing overall risk

6.2 If you must short directionally, do it like this

If you absolutely insist on directional shorts, consider:

Use low leverage
- 1–3× is plenty in crypto; the volatility itself is leverage
Risk tiny fractions of your account
- 0.5–2% of total equity per trade, maximum
- Size positions backwards from the stop, not forward from your greed
Short bounces, not breakdowns
- In a downtrend, the best shorts are often failed rallies, not chasing red candles
- Wait for price to pop into resistance, then fade the move
Define invalidation clearly
- Your stop should be at a level where your idea is wrong, not just “a bit above entry”
- Don’t move the stop just because it feels uncomfortable
Respect the calendar
- Avoid high leverage before major news: CPI, FOMC, ETF decisions, big unlocks, earnings, etc.
- Those events are short-squeeze factories

7. Final thoughts: why I say shorts are “more unfair”

To summarize my view:

Payoff structure is worse for shorts (limited gain, theoretically unlimited loss)
Market structure usually favors upward drift in the long run
Leverage + liquidations make short squeezes more violent than most uptrends
Funding, borrow fees, and 24/7 volatility silently work against leveraged shorts
Even in a one-way downtrend, the path is full of bounces designed to kill over-leveraged bears

That’s why I believe:

Shorts – especially leveraged futures shorts – require more discipline, more precision, and more humility than longs.
The market already makes it hard enough to win. There’s no need to make it even harder by misusing the most dangerous tool on the desk.

Shorts are not evil. They are necessary for healthy markets, proper price discovery, and risk management.
But if you treat them like an easy “print money in a bear market” button, the market will teach you very quickly how wrong that assumption is.

This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice; any decisions you make with your money are entirely your own responsibility.

UntagMoney

Search This Blog